Hofstadter v. Bienstock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent, upon the authority of the majority opinion in Villemin v. Brown (193 App. Div. 777). The complaint in the ease at bar does not allege that the alleged slanderous word was applied to the plaintiff in his profession. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Burr, JJ.; Dowling, J., dissents in memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Villemin v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weiner v. LevitonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Mishkin v. RoreckNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Bruno v. SchukartNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Dietrich v. HauserNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Lendino v. FiorenzaNew York Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.