Legal Opinion

Mishkin v. Roreck

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

This motion is to dismiss for legal insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106) the second count of the complaint which alleges slander. The spoken words were: “ You God damned son of a bitch; you lousy crook; you God damned bastard.” Special damages are not pleaded. Plaintiff proceeds on the theory that the utterance is slanderous per se.

The only extrinsic facts alleged are: Plaintiff, a real estate broker, dealer and builder, is sixty-seven years old, bears a good reputation for honesty, uprighteousness and credit; the words were uttered at a golf club where an outing was in progress which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Hunt v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Fowles v. . BowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Brooker v. CoffinNew York Supreme Court · 1809

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Jacksonville Kennel ClubSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. People v. FergusonNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bruno v. SchukartNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. McMillian v. Atlantic Oldsmobile, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API