Legal Opinion
Bruno v. Schukart
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGr. Bobebt Wither, J.
Plaintiff moves to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim founded in slander on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The substance of the counterclaim is contained in paragraph second, which reads as follows: ‘ ‘ That on or about the 21st day of May, 1958, in the Small Claims Court Boom of City Court, City of Bochester, (Civil Branch) on Exchange Street, in the City of Bochester, County of Monroe, and State of New York, without just cause or provocation, and maliciously, the plaintiff in a loud tone of voice said to the defendant: ‘ You’re a liar and a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gurtler v. Union Parts Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Villemin v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Harris v. New York, Westchester & Boston Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Weiner v. LevitonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Hofstadter v. BienstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. KittermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Jordan v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Lady Windsor Hairdressers, Inc. v. CalvoNew York Supreme Court · 1962