People ex rel. Farnum v. San Francisco Savings Union
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This cause was submitted to the court below upon an agreed statement.
Defendant had judgment, from which plaintiff appeals.
The defendant is a banking corporation, existing under and by virtue of the laws of this state, and was incorporated as such on the eighteenth day of June, 1862, under and in accordance with the provisions of an act of the legislature, entitled “ An act' to provide for the formation of corporations for the accumulation and investment of funds and savings,” approved April 11, 1862. (Stats. 1862, p. 199.)
The act provides for the formation of corporations “for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eyster v. Centennial Board of FinanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Connolly v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Earl v. RoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
- Andrews v. BoydSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1828
3Cited by22 opinions
- Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Mutual Benefit Life Ins. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
- Kohn v. KohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Iowa Southern Utilities Co. v. CassillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Howard v. D. W. Hobson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.