Legal Opinion

Ross v. Columbus Mining Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 26, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

¡Opinion of the Court by

Judge 0 ’Neal —

-Reversing.

Tbe appellants, George Ross and J. B. Rayner, as plaintiffs in a joint petition, sought to recover damages from the appellee, Columbus Mining Company, for its breach of an oral contract which they claim it entered into with them.

They allege in their petition “that on the 16th day of August, 1916, they entered into an oral contract with this defendant company ... to take up and continue to drive a certain entry in the defendant’s mine, and pursuant- to that (sic) terms of said oral contract the plaintiffs agreed to drive said entry and air…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harness v. Kentucky Fluor Spar Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. R. Burleigh & Sons v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Stearns Lumber Co. v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Boutwell v. Lewis Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
  3. Columbus Mining Company v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Swain v. Harmount & Woolf Tie Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Blue Diamond Coal Company v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API