Legal Opinion

Conviser v. DePaul University

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 31, 2021No. 1:20-cv-03094Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DR. JENNY H. CONVISER and ASCEND CONSULATION IN HEALH CARE, LLC, Plaintiffs, No. 20-cv-03094 Judge Franklin U. Valderrama v. DEPAUL UNIVERSITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Dr. Jenny H. Conviser (Dr. Conviser) and Ascend Consultation in Health Care, LLC (Ascend) (collectively, Plaintiffs) have filed suit against Defendant DePaul University (DePaul), asserting wrongful retaliation under Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. and several related state law claims. Plaintiffs’ claims stem…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API