Legal Opinion

Northern Utilities, Inc. v. City of South Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 2, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

The Defendant, City of South Portland (“the City”) appeals from a declaratory judgment rendered by the Superior Court (Cumberland County) after a two day trial before the court without a jury, declaring that an easement owned by Northern Utilities, Inc. (“Northern”) prohibited the City from requiring Toys “R” Us to build a sidewalk over an underground pipeline on Northern’s easement.

In 1982 Northern acquired an easement on private land to protect a natural gas transmission pipeline running beside the Maine Mall Road in South Portland. 1 The pipeline was buried three to six…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. AC McLoon & CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Cushing v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. First Hartford Corp. v. Kennebec Water DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bliss v. BlissSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. Fine Line, Inc. v. BlakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Pettee v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Lario Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
  5. Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. 16.66 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API