Legal Opinion
Pettee v. Young
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 9, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Maynard Pettee appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Hjelm, J.), affirming a judgment of the District Court (Bar Harbor, Gunther, J.) in Pettee’s action against Young. 1 The District Court found the deed from Young to Pettee to be ambiguous. We disagree and vacate the judgment in part.
I
[¶2] Young and Pettee own adjoining properties in the Seal Harbor Village section of the town of Mt. Desert. Pettee has two buildings on his property. One is a finished cottage with full utilities and the other is an unfinished “carpenter’s shop” without utilities. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Beckwith v. RossiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- Colquhoun v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Saltonstall v. CummingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Gutcheon v. BectonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MILL POND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. ManalioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Silsby v. BelchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Stanton v. StrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- NORTH SEBAGO SHORES, LLC v. MazzagliaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Kinderhaus North LLC v. Karl NicolsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.