Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Lario Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This case is now before the court upon plaintiffs prayer for a permanent injunction against the further construction and operation of Heartland Park Topeka (HPT), a motor sports racing facility being constructed over pipelines operated by plaintiff. After a hearing upon a preliminary injunction motion, which the court denied, the parties agreed, pursuant to FED.R. CIV.P. 65(a)(2), that the court could consider the evidence presented at the hearing upon the preliminary injunction motion, together with final argument at a subsequent hearing, to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Stewart v. WelshTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Kennedy & Mitchell, Inc. v. Anadarko Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- State v. Daytona Beach Racing & Rec. Fac. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Potter v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte County/Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Lario Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mid-America Pipeline Company v. Lario Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991