Legal Opinion

Western Dakota Land & Horse Co. v. Woods

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pennington County. Hon. L,Evi McGee, Judge. Action by the Western Dakota Land & Horse Company against William S. Woods and another. From an order denying a motion of defendant named to compel plaintiff to summons q,n the codefendant, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

Plaintiff brought this action, naming as defendants (as appears from the title to the summons and complaint herein) William S. Woods and Matilda C. Woods. The summons was served upon the defendant, William S. Woods, and, plaintiff not having caused said summons or complaint to be served upon Matilda C. Woods, William S. Woods, upon the affidavit of his counsel, moved the trial court for an order requiring-plaintiff to cause the summons to be served on defendant, Matilda C. Woods, and extending the time in which he could .serve and file his answer until after the time of the service of such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Osterhoudt v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. MacKenzie v. HodgkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Bank of Iowa & Dakota v. PriceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chalmers v. TrentUtah Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alderman v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wright v. McKenzieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API