Legal Opinion
Gretener, A.G. v. Dyson-Kissner Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1969No. 66 Civ. 3966Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LASKER, District Judge.
Defendant objects to plaintiff’s and plaintiffs-intervenors’ interrogatories Nos. 52 and 53, which read as follows:
“Interrogatory 52. Set forth in detail the features of the textile bobbin described in claim 2 of defendant’s United States Patent No. 3,107,067 which are not present in the textile bobbins made in accordance with defendant’s drawings DMU-ND dated April 23, 1956 (Mod. #6 dated December 14, 1956), PR-220 dated April 16, 1956 (Mod. #5 dated August 21,1956), and PR-210-2 dated April 13, 1956 (Mod. #4 dated June 1,1956) and having steel tubes with an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Nakken Patents Corp. v. RabinowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
- Lanova Corporation v. National Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Hoak v. Empire Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1946
- Textrol, Inc. v. D. C. Oviatt Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.