Legal Opinion

Shepherd-Teague Co. v. Hermann

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1910No. Civ. No. 609PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant for the sum of $1,500, commission claimed to have been earned under a written contract of employment to find a purchaser for and negotiate a sale and transfer of certain real property for defendant. This is an appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Defendant in his answer admitted that he executed a written agreement in favor of the plaintiff, by which the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff a commission of $1,500, “provided that the said plaintiff should consummate a sale of certain property therein named and set…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Miles v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Oregon Home Builders v. Montgomery Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Purcell v. FirthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API