Legal Opinion
Van Alen v. Aluminum Co. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The complaint alleges two causes of action at law: One for damages arising out of patent infringement and another for conversion of a drawing. The case has been through an extensive pre-trial history, as a result of which the pleadings depart considerably from those standards of simplicity which it was the aim of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to establish. There is also considerable dispute concerning the meaning and effect of certain stipulations and orders which were intended to segregate the issues triable to a jury from…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Ide v. Trorlicht, Duncker & Renard Carpet Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Binger v. UngerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Shaffer v. Coty, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1960
- General Motors Corp. v. California Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.