Legal Opinion

Ide v. Trorlicht, Duncker & Renard Carpet Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1902No. 1,646PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. This is an appeal from a decree which dismissed a bill for the infringement of claims 3, 4, and 5 of reissued letters patent No. 11,730, and claims 3 and 4 of letters patent No. 397,293. The former patent was for combinations of devices for the automatic oiling of certain stationary bearings of a horizontal engine, and the latter was for novel combinations of mechanical elements for the…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. This is an appeal from a decree which dismissed a bill for the infringement of claims 3, 4, and 5 of reissued letters patent No. 11,730, and claims 3 and 4 of letters patent No. 397,293. The former patent was for combinations of devices for the automatic oiling of certain stationary bearings of a horizontal engine, and the latter was for novel combinations of mechanical elements for the automatic lubrication of the bearing of the crosshead wrist-pin of such an engine. Letters patent No. 397,293 were…

1Opinion of the CourtSanborn, Circuit Judge

In the natural and logical order of consideration of the usual issues presented in a case involving the alleged infringement of patented monopolies, the first question which presents itself is the validity of the patents upon which the suit is based. Both of the patents here in issue are attacked upon the ground that there was no novelty in the devices they described, and that the production of the improvements whose use they secured called for no exercise of the inventive faculty. The reissued patent is also assailed upon the additional grounds that it is not for the same invention as was…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Brun v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Gillons v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. New York Scaffolding Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. Century Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API