Mothersead v. Harris
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The defendants in error instituted a suit in the district court of Bryan county against the plaintiffs in error to recover, the amount of two drafts issued by the Eirst. State Bank of Calera, as a preferred claim against that bank, and recovered judgment therefor. Prom that judgment the plaintiffs in .error appealed to this court. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.
The agreed fact's are that on January 6, 1927, the plaintiffs had a cheeking account in the First State Bank of Calera and the balance therein was $4,000; they owed Two wholesale houses; on…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- The People v. . Merchants and Mechanics' Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Citizens Bank v. Bradley, ExaminerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Harrison v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Cashmere State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Moon Motor Car Co. v. State Ex Rel. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Pure Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- State ex rel. Sim v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Riches v. Hadlock, Bank Com'r.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.