Legal Opinion · Dissent

Riches v. Hadlock, Bank Com'r.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1932No. 5290Published

1Dissent

I am not able to agree to the conclusion reached by the majority. We are dealing here with a new question. It is not the usual case of a receiver's power to borrow money to be expended in expenses of administration. Borrowing money for that purpose is of doubtful expediency in most cases, and so subject to abuse that the courts, although not denying the power, have hedged it about with restrictions and limitations. But here the situation is wholly different. The national government, as a measure of relief to the creditors of suspended banks, through the Reconstruction Finance Corporation,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frederick v. McRaeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. National Surety Co. v. PixtonUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hanson v. SognSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ex parte SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Van Meter v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API