Granberry v. Jones
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
Granberry, appellee here, and Miss Jones, appellant here, each owned a residence on adjoining lots in Tulla-homa. Due to the narrow frontage, Granberry’s residence is a little less than five and one-half feet from the boundary line between the two properties. Miss Jones planted an evergreen shrubbery hedge entirely on her side and within a few inches of this boundary line. This hedge has grown to a height of about twenty feet and its branches and foliage have grown over the boundary line and over Granberry’s property to such an extent as *53to rest against that side of Granberry’s residence and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SoarisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Smith v. HoltSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Bliss v. BallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Skinner v. WilderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Sterling v. WeinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Ogle v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
- State v. LayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.