Legal Opinion
Susman v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1969No. Civ. 32056PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, P. J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of dismissal entered after the general demurrers of the defendants City of Los Angeles and State of California to the plaintiffs’ complaint as amended had been sustained with leave to amend (see rule 202(e), Cal. Rules of Court) and the plaintiffs had elected not to file another amended pleading. The action relates to the “Watts’ Riot” of 1965.
In paragraph VIII of the first cause of action it was alleged that the plaintiffs were the owners of real and personal property in the City of Los Angeles as to which they suffered damage as follows: “In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mann v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.