Legal Opinion

Kandel v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 30, 2009No. 06-872CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*438 OPINION

SMITH, Senior Judge.

This ease is now before the Court on the Government’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. In support of its motion, the Government cites the recent Supreme Court decision John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 750, 169 L.Ed.2d 591 (2008). The Government argues that this new decision precludes the Court from considering whether certain equitable considerations warrant extending the statute of limitations contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2501. After full briefing, including Plaintiff’s Response and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fauvergue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Gerald K. Kandel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API