Legal Opinion

Paul v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 4, 2004No. A04A0579PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

The Superior Court of Richmond County denied Larry Paul’s plea in bar, rejecting Paul’s claim that a retrial on charges of aggravated assault and possession of a knife was barred by double jeopardy. Paul appeals, reasserting his double jeopardy argument. Finding no error, we affirm.

Because a trial court sits as the factfinder when ruling on a plea of double jeopardy, the appellate court will uphold its resolution of factual issues unless it is clearly erroneous. State v. Thomas, 275 Ga. 167, 168 (562 SE2d 501) (2002). “Atrial court’s findings of fact will not be deemed to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Paul v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Dinning v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bostic v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Clarence M. Woody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API