Legal Opinion

Campos v. Employment Development Department

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1982No. Civ. 53077PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Engracia Campos and others appeal from a judgment denying administrative mandamus and other relief connected with claims by appellants for unemployment benefits. Benefits were terminated by the Employment Development Department on the ground that appellants, former employees of real parties Brendlin-Rice Company and others, had left their work because of a trade dispute. More than 100 claimants, including each of the present appellants, took an administrative appeal from this determination. An administrative law judge upheld the termination of benefits; that decision was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Dole Hawaii Division-Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. RamilHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Aguilar v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Kosmos Cement Co., Inc. v. HaneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Conservatorship of LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API