Legal Opinion
Aguilar v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1990No. D010304PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
Introduction
In this case we hold the California Employment Development Department (EDD) must pay interest on unemployment benefits it erroneously refused to pay to a group of farm workers. The benefits were a monetary obligation capable of being made certain and the workers’ right to the benefits vested on particular days. Under Tripp v. Swoap (1976) 17 Cal.3d 671, 682 [131 CaI.Rptr. 789, 552 P.2d 749] (Tripp v. Swoap), those are the only conditions which must exist to recover interest in a mandamus action against the state. Accordingly we affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Robles v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Flethez v. San Bernardino Co. Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Brown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.