Legal Opinion
Doble v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1957No. Misc. No. 648PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
An application for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition directed to the United States District Court and a judge thereof has been presented ex parte. The application is alleged to have been based upon 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651. It is recited that in a pending patent case, numbered 13289-T.C., (neither the title of the case nor the names of the parties thereto being mentioned) an order was entered by the judge directing petitioner to come to Los Angeles to permit his deposition to be taken there. Petitioner is a witness. He is not a party. In the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- National Bondholders Corporation v. McClinticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edward Belfer, Samuel P. Norton, William F. Raff and Leonard I. Turner v. Martin Pence, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Sykes International, Ltd. v. Pilch's Poultry Breeding Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
- Jones v. SchlenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- W. A. Doble v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957