Legal Opinion
Edward Belfer, Samuel P. Norton, William F. Raff and Leonard I. Turner v. Martin Pence, United States District Judge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1970No. 26391_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners are officers, directors or alleged managing agents of a eorporation against which suit has been brought in the District Court for the District of Hawaii. Their depositions were taken in the Central District of California. Dissatisfied with their responses, the District Court for the District of Hawaii entered an order that defendant corporation and petitioners, individually, disclose certain information in writing. Petitioners seek from this court a writ of mandamus or prohibition, in effect vacating the order of the District Court in so far as it applies to them.
Relying on Rule…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mulligan v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Fred Benioff Co. v. McCullochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Doble v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- John J. Donnelly v. Honorable Barrington D. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. LydickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.