Legal Opinion

Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1956No. 14299PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The decision on the merits of the der claratory relief injunction case. in. suit as to infringement of patents was formalized in the district court’s judgment which followed our mandate in accordance with our opinion and decision. Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Lab., Inc., 9 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 624. These two appeals are from the district court’s- judgment referred to and concern the proper assessment of costs, att torney fees claimed allowable to the plaintiff, and an issue of damages claimed by the plaintiff for libel or slander as to plaintiff’s patents. In…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
  3. Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. McWilliams Dredging Co. v. Department of Highways of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. The EuropeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Corelogic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Purer & Company and Phillip Purer v. Aktiebolaget Addo and Addo MacHine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API