Legal Opinion

Zuckerman v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2002No. S096127PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*36Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Under California law, the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) may discipline any chiropractor who engages in professional misconduct. A chiropractor accused of misconduct is entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge, whose proposed decision is reviewed by the Board. A chiropractor found to have committed misconduct may be ordered to pay the “reasonable costs of investigation and prosecution of the case,” including attorney fees, that the Board incurred “up to the date of the hearing . . . .” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 16, § 317.5.)

Here, a disciplined…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Guardianship of Ann S.California Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Coffman Specialties, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. MacIelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. City of Bellflower v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API