Legal Opinion
City of Bellflower v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 2016No. C075832; C076075PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
— Under the redevelopment dissolution law, the Legislature directed that a dissolved redevelopment agency’s funds not needed to meet enforceable obligations must be turned over to the county’s auditor-controller for distribution to local taxing entities. After the California Supreme Court found that dissolving the redevelopment agencies was an appropriate exercise of the Legislature’s constitutional power, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill No. 1484 (2011-2012 Reg. Sess.) providing what to do if the successor agency or sponsoring agency of the former redevelopment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Brentwood v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Tracy v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of Culver City v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Cal. Dep't of Fin. v. City of Merced, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- City of Big Bear Lake v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.