Garland v. Garland
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
This appeal is from an order entered in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County by Judge Kenneth C. Proctor finding the appellant in contempt of that court. Because procedural requirements and the manner of the punishment flow from the nature of the proceeding, State v. Roll and Scholl, 267 Md. 714, 730, 298 A. 2d 867 (1973), which modified and affirmed Roll and Scholl v. State, 15 Md. App. 31, 288 A. 2d 605 (1972), we shall first examine the law relating to contempts.
The Court of Appeals said in State v. Roll and Scholl, supra, at 727:
“Today, contempts are classified as civil or criminal and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- McDaniel v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Winter v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Pearson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Krokyn v. KrokynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979