Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 10, 1970No. [No. 178, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

The extraordinary thing about this case is the number of judicial and professional man-hours it has consumed, to so little purpose. Five years ago the appellee (Christine) sued the appellant (McDaniel) for a divorce a mensa and the usual ancillary relief. McDaniel responded with a cross-bill for a divorce a vinculo. A year and a half later, 6 July 1966, the parties were divorced a vinculo but McDaniel was ordered by Judge Turnbull to pay $30 per week, through the probation department of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, for the support of three infant children.

Within 90 days Christine…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Knaus v. KnausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Donner v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Hendershot v. HendershotWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Floyd v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API