Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Coleman Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 9, 1994No. Civ. A. Nos. 93-CV-6733, 94-CV-2779PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAYTHONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Joint Motion to Strike Insufficient Answers and Objections, to Compel Complete Answers and Production of Documents, and for Sanctions Against Defendant, The Coleman *346Company, Inc. The Defendant has filed an Answering Memorandum of Law in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion, and Plaintiffs filed a Reply in response to Defendant’s Answer.
Plaintiffs have filed this action claiming products liability and negligence based on the deaths of plaintiffs’ decedents, Gustave Caruso and Richard Schwarzman.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinea v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Donald Boyd Julander, and v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. McCullochDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
- Gluck v. Ansett Australia Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- United States v. Matusoff Rental Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Environmental & Demolition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.