Legal Opinion
United States v. Matusoff Rental Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 24, 2001No. C-3-99-626PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXPENSES (DOC. #42); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A SINGLE TRIAL AND TO COMPEL DISCOVERY OF DEFENDANTS’ FINANCES (DOC. #44); CAPTIONED CAUSE ORDERED BIFURCATED, ALTHOUGH NOT IN MANNER SUGGESTED BY DEFENDANTS
RICE, Chief Judge.
The Government brings this litigation under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., alleging that the Defendants have discriminated against prospective tenants at the Villa de Marquis apartment complex, located in Xenia, Ohio, on the basis of their race and familial status. In its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Beverly Hills Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Martin v. HeidemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Big D Enterprises, Inc. Dr. Edwin G. DooleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Ann Bass v. Jostens, Inc., and James Dredge, Jostens Learning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Cunningham v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- In re Heparin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. California Psychiatric TransitionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Environmental & Demolition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.