Legal Opinion

Meinck v. City of Gastonia

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 2018No. 130PA17PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Justice.

*355 Here we consider whether the trial court erred in granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant, the City of Gastonia, based upon the doctrine of governmental immunity. The Court of Appeals concluded that governmental immunity did not apply and reversed the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant. Meinck v. City of Gastonia , --- N.C. App. ----, 798 S.E.2d 417 (2017). Because we conclude that defendant is entitled to governmental immunity, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to that court for further…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southern Power Company v. Cleveland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  3. Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  4. Flomeh-Mawutor v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  5. Lexington Hous. Auth. v. GeraldNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API