Legal Opinion

Weakley v. City of Dearborn Heights

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 2000No. Docket 212008PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiff tripped and fell on a removed portion of a public sidewalk maintained by defendant city of Dear-born Heights and adjacent to property owned by defendants Darron and Rosemary Duncan. The city had removed the entire section of the sidewalk for the purpose of repair, but did not erect a blockade or other warning device to alert pedestrians to the miss ing sidewalk. At the time of the fall, plaintiff, who was visiting his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pick v SzymczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Laier v. KitchenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Regents of the University of Michigan v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Weakley v. City of Dearborn HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Marchyok v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Ali Bazzi v. City of Dearborn HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API