Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Warren

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Minnesota Law Applies.

The first issue presented on this appeal is whether Minnesota law applied in determining the rights of the parties under the Minnesota insurance policy.

Appellant Home Insurance Company asserted, among others, the policy defense of lack of notice of accident by the insured. The trial court concluded that Minnesota contract law should govern and construed Minnesota law as (1) imposing absolute liability to the amount of $10,000 upon the insurer upon the filing of an SR-22, and (2) requiring the insurer to assume the burden of proof on the notice defense in regard to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Conklin v. HornerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Haines v. Mid-Century InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. KollerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hunker v. Royal Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API