Hunker v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The facts of this case show substantial contacts with the state of the forum, Wisconsin, and with the state of Ohio.
In addition to being the forum, Wisconsin is the state in which the accident occurred, and one of the parties to the collision on the Wisconsin highway wTas a Wisconsin resident.
The plaintiff is a resident of Ohio and his action is against an Ohio insurance company which issued the liability policy in thé state of Ohio to Brown, an Ohio resident, the plaintiff’s coemployee and driver. Both Hunker and Brown were employees of an Ohio corporation. Their trip to Wisconsin, commenced…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Heath v. ZellmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Zimmerman v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Conklin v. HornerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Hataway v. McKinleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Fairbanks Morse, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.