Legal Opinion

Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2004No. 73614-6PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

88 P.3d 395 (2004)

151 Wash.2d 303

Rebecca HAMM, Petitioner,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 73614-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 22, 2003.

Decided April 22, 2004.

Graham Lundberg & Perschel, Kenneth Dore, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Reed McClure, William Hickman, Pamela Okano, Todd & Wakefield, Robert Mannheimer, Seattle, Mark Koenig, c/o John Roche, Northport, NY, for Respondent.

Debra Stephens, Gary Bloom, Bryan Harnetiaux, Spokane, for Amicus Curiae (Washington State Trial Lawyers Assn).

FAIRHURST, J.

A no-fault motorist was injured in a car…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Alexander; Concurrence · Johnson.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Sherry v. Financial Indem. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sherry v. Financial Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Columbia Community Bank v. Newman Park, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API