Legal Opinion

Celanese Corporation of America v. Vanity Fair Silk Mills

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 11, 1931No. 2611PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents dismissing the opposition of appellant and holding that appel-lee was entitled to the registration of the mark “Silkenese” for use on knitted and textile underwear, consisting of vests, bloomers, knickerbockers, drawers, union suits, chemises, envelope chemises, corset covers, nightgowns, bathing suits, pajamas, pettibockers, step-in drawers, princess slips, bandeaux, bandeau chemises, and men’s silk underwear.

In its application for registration, filed May 21,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Sharp & Dohme v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Decker & Cohn, Inc. v. S. Liebovitz Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Apex Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Landers, Frary & ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Postum Cereal Co. v. Enzo Jel Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Esso, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Celotex Co. v. MillingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. American Cyanamid Co. v. Synthetic Nitrogen Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  4. Eureka Williams Corp. v. Willoughby MacH. & Tool Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. Revere Sugar Refinery v. SalvatoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API