Legal Opinion

Goodall Worsted Co. v. Palm Knitting Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 1, 1926No. Nos. 1810-1812PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

These are trade-mark opposition proceedings, in which the Patent Office dismissed the opposition, and held that appellee is entitled to register the words “Palm-Knit,” with the representation of a palm tree in a rectangle, as its ¡trade-mark. •

It is not disputed that the goods of the respective parties are of the same descriptive properties. Appellant sought to register the words “Palm Beach” as its trademark, and an opposition was filed by a prior user and registrant of the mark “Palm Island,” accompanied by the representation of a palm ■ tree. Appellant succeeded in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Bon Ami Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Lever Bros. Co. v. Riodela Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Sharp & Dohme v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Ansco Photoproducts, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API