Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. La Prade v. Smith

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1934No. Civil No. 3360PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is a complaint by the state, on the relation of the Attorney General, for an injunction against A. T. Smith to enjoin and restrain him from practicing medicine and surgery without first having obtained a license to do so. The trial court was of the opinion that the facts stated in the complaint were not sufficient to authorize the interposition of equity and for that reason sustained defendant’s demurrer and entered judgment of dismissal. The state has appealed and assigns the court’s ruling as error.

It is alleged in the complaint that defendant, Smith, is now, and has been since June,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Board of Medical Examiners of Utah v. BlairUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. People ex rel. Shepardson v. Universal Chiropractors' Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. City of Huntington v. State Water CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Funk Jewelry Co. v. State Ex Rel. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Corte v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API