Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hughes Capital Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 9, 1997No. 96-5401UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

The three appellants in the present matter were defendants in an action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the SEC against all the defendants on the issues of both liability and damages. 1 Susan La-chance and Howard Ackerman, two of the defendants, appeal from both the judgment of liability and the disgorgement order; Lionel Reifler appeals only from the order of disgorgement. Although the appellants raise a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,516, 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1288 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hughes Capital Corporation F.D. Roberts Securities, Inc. Howard Ackerman Gilbert Beall Dominick Fiorese Frederick Galiardo Sheldon G. Kanoff John Knoblauch Susan Lachance Alan Lieb Frederic Mascolo John Perfetti Lionel Reifler Ira Victor, Lionel Reifler, Susan Lachance, and Howard AckermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API