Legal Opinion

Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 6, 2011No. Civil Action 03-10038-RGSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEARNS, District Judge.

In this patent infringement case, plaintiff MBO Laboratories, Inc. (MBO) asserts that defendant Becton, Dickinson and Company’s (Becton’s) SafetyGlide device infringes U.S. Reissue Patent No. 36,885 (the RE '885 patent) (filed July 1, 1999). At issue are competing syringe designs intended to protect health care workers from needle-stick injuries. Presently before the court is Becton’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of claims 13, 19, and 20 of the RE '885 patent. The court heard oral…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v. Berry Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
  2. MOSKOWITZ FAMILY LLC v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. T.M. Patents, L.P. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API