Legal Opinion

Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v. Berry Plastics Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided November 7, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-02108-WGY-cgcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.1

I. INTRODUCTION

The motion presently before this Court arises from a patent infringement suit filed by Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. (“Multilayer”), the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,265,055 (the “'055 Patent”), against Berry Plastics Corporation (“Berry”). Following the claim construction hearing and the filing of the Markman order, Berry filed its present motion for summary judgment, arguing that, as matter of law, none of Berry’s accused products infringe the '055 Patent as- construed. Arguments on this motion were heard on July 17,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v. Berry Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v. Berry Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API