T.M. Patents, L.P. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the present case, plaintiffs T.M. Patents, L.P. and T.M. Creditors LLC (collectively, “T.M. Patents”) charge the defendant, Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), with infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,212,773 (“the '773 Patent”), titled “Wormhole Communications Arrangement for Massively Parallel Processor.” This memoran*95dum addresses three motions brought by the parties: (1) a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement brought by Cisco, (2) a motion for partial summary judgment brought by Cisco to limit damages, and (3) a cross-motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.