Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 2018No. CR–17–972PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaren R. Baker, Associate Justice

Appellant Richard J. Jackson brings this appeal from the denial by the trial court of his pro se "petition to reconsider and/or modify sentence." Jackson argued in the petition, which sought postconviction relief from his sentence,1 that a hearing should be held so that he could make the trial court aware of new and mitigating circumstances that would affect the sentence imposed in his criminal case. The trial court denied the relief sought on the grounds that Jackson's petition was meritless. While Jackson did not invoke either Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 or Arkansas Code…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Richie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Maiden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Randall Thomas McArty v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Redus v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Lee Charles Millsap, Jr. v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Eugene Wesley v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Oscar Willingham v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API