Van Jenkins v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtJohn Dan Kemp, Chief Justice
1 ⅜ Appellant Dennis Van Jenkins has appealed from the denial of his pro se petition to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-90-111 (Repl. 2016). In the pro se petition filed below, Jenkins alleged that his sentence was illegally imposed in that he was sentenced for multiple offenses that arose out of one course of conduct. Jenkins cited Rowe v. State, 276 Ark. 37, 627 S.W.2d 16 (1982) (per curiam), as authority for the proposition that a defendant may not be sentenced on both a charged felony and an underlying felony, as the underlying felony is a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rowbottom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Redus v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Lee Charles Millsap, Jr. v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Swift v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Eugene Wesley v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.