Eichbauer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Carl Kiburtz of Monroe, Michigan, in order to qualify as a dealer in securities in Michigan, executed a bond with defendant as surety, in compliance with (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9790), the blue sky law. He opened an office in Monroe where, as appeared from his printed stationery and a schedule of his liabilities, he engaged in the general business of buying, selling and trading in bonds, stocks, mortgages and farm loans.
• Plaintiff and his family had several transactions with Kiburtz as their broker, involving the purchase of bonds and mortgages. In August, 1931, plaintiff agreed to purchase a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zapf v. RidenourSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Hogberg v. LandfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Waisbren v. BlinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Lee v. WisnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Stone v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Detwiler v. GlavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1937