Legal Opinion

Eichbauer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1937No. Docket No. 125, Calendar No. 39,211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Carl Kiburtz of Monroe, Michigan, in order to qualify as a dealer in securities in Michigan, executed a bond with defendant as surety, in compliance with (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9790), the blue sky law. He opened an office in Monroe where, as appeared from his printed stationery and a schedule of his liabilities, he engaged in the general business of buying, selling and trading in bonds, stocks, mortgages and farm loans.

• Plaintiff and his family had several transactions with Kiburtz as their broker, involving the purchase of bonds and mortgages. In August, 1931, plaintiff agreed to purchase a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zapf v. RidenourSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Hogberg v. LandfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Waisbren v. BlinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lee v. WisnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Stone v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Detwiler v. GlavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API