Lee v. Wisner
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. Assumpsit on bond. Defendant in error was plaintiff below. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
This controversy arises upon a bond given by Lee to indemnify Wisner upon the liability of the latter upon a forfeited official .bond of John B. Dillingham who had been collector of the Port of Mackinaw.
On the 29th of July, 1867, Dillingham, Wisner, and Hiram O. Driggs, became jointly and severally bound to the United States in the penal sum of $5,000 conditioned for Dillingham’s faithful execution and discharge of the-duties of his office as collector.
Some time in the year 1870 Wisner was informed that' Dillingham was behind in his accounts, and received, a. balance sheet from the government…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eslow v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by7 opinions
- People ex rel. Norris v. MersereauMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- P R Post Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Ireland v. Linn County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Downey v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- The Shepard Land Company v. BaniganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.