Legal Opinion

Zapf v. Ridenour

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 11, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

Chapter 13-B, Title IX, Supplemental Supplement to the Code, 1915, contains what is commonly known as the “Blue Sky Act.” This statute has since been amended, and is now a part of Chapter 393, Code of 1924. The statute requires that, before a stockbroker . , . -, . ,, . , , •, may engage m business as such, m this state, he must secure from the secretary of state a permit. The original act under which this suit arose provided as follows:

“Before being granted such permit by the secretary of state the stockbroker or dealer shall give a bond in the penal sum of five thousand dollars to the state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Schisel v. MarvillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Nebraska Culvert & Manufacturing Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Wagner v. KelsoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Curtis v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Blumenthal v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. City of Charles City v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. United Fire & Casualty Co. v. AckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. State Surety Co. v. LensingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API