Legal Opinion

Waisbren v. Blink

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

In this action for money had and received, plaintiff seeks to recover the purchase price which he paid for shares'of stock of an Illinois corporation which was not licensed to engage in business in Wisconsin. No permits had been obtained authorizing the sale of that stock, or authorizing defendant to sell stock in Wisconsin, as was required by sec. 183.27, Stats. 1923 (now 189.07), and sec. 183.29 (now 189.12, 189.13) of the so-called Blue Sky Law. Upon the trial the learned circuit judge, after finding the essential facts as to plaintiff’s purchase and payment for the stock in January, 1924,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. May v. BlackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Town of Saxville v. BartlettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hall v. HinckleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Town of Emery v. Town of WorcesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Musante-Phillips, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1941
  2. Peterson v. Minden Beef Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Vieau v. Common Council of the City of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Waller Carson & Co. v. LeedomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Josslyn v. Dahinden-Schmitz Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API