Vaccari
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.
The two appellants before the court, Janet Vac-cari and Deana Pistone (collectively, witnesses), appeal from the denial by a single justice of their petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. In their petition, the witnesses sought relief from Superior Court orders granting them immunity pursuant to G. L. c. 233, §§ 20C-20E, and ordering them to testify in the criminal trial of David Forlizzi and Fred Battista. We conclude *757that the witnesses have not shown that they cannot obtain adequate relief from the challenged orders in the normal process of appellate review, and therefore, the denial…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. William J. CintoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Attorney General v. ColletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LeClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- In Re: Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Superior Court · 2020
- S.W. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
- State v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014